Showing posts with label time. Show all posts
Showing posts with label time. Show all posts

Monday, 5 August 2013

Beginnings and Endings

Sark.  Photo by Roger Hyland

I have come to the conclusion that there are no beginnings or endings, simply a continual passage of time, which I used to see as linear, then circular and, finally, as a figure of eight - the infinity symbol, moving back and forth between past and present into the future...

I like to play with this concept when I write.  Beginnings are always scary but exhilarating.  A bit like a plane taking off.  The start of the journey into the unknown. Endings are different.  They need to be satisfying, both to write and for the reader.  They don’t need to tie up all the loose ends, because life isn’t like that.  And when you think you have finished, you often find that the perfect ending is actually the perfect beginning.  And vice versa. 

I use this idea when I teach creative writing workshops.  It encourages fluidity; an open-minded approach to the creative process and the realisation that it is organic.


Elastic infinity (photo by Jane Ayres)




Sunday, 12 May 2013

Readers: Does Size Matter?

I’ve just had another Amazon review of Beware of the Horse. The reader rated the story “very good” and liked my writing style, which makes me happy.  But her basis for giving it only 3 stars was that the book was much too short.  In fact she described it as a short story.

I’m not sure how you would define a short story but for me, 67 pages and nearly 18,000 words is not a short story.  More of a novella (according to a publisher definition this will be between 15,000-20,000 words).  The book is aimed at pre-teens and teens, and I’ve been told can be especially enjoyed by reluctant readers.  (I’ve previously had stories published in collections for reluctant readers, and most of my novels for teens are around 26,000 words).  Other reviewers have said they read Beware of the Horse quickly and commented on the length so I have revised the description to make it clear who it is aimed at and now describe it as a novella.  I don’t want my readers to be disappointed or to feel cheated. But it got me thinking.

Do readers value a book by its size?  How big it is, how thick the width, how heavy the weight, how many pages?  Of course, with e-books you don’t have this tangible aspect of book buying.  (My recent post Reading Bigger Books refers to this). Pages aren’t numbered in e-books, so how can you tell how many there are? If it’s 800 pages do you expect more than if was 200 pages? Quantity equals quality? Would you expect a book priced higher to be better than a cheap one?  You get what you pay for?  Or does that not apply to books?

It is easy with e-books to have our expectations manipulated when there are so many books for free or less than £1. Recently, the bestseller Life of Pi by Yann Martel was on special promotion for 20p (now back to £2.84).  The large publisher behind it could afford to fund this but how can smaller publishers and indie authors compete?  By lowering their prices even more?  This kind of pricing strategy will eventually devalue books completely and the wonderful opportunities offered to indie writers by the digital revolution will turn round and bite us on the bum, so to speak.    
My e-books are priced between £1.95 - £2.98. Many e-books cost just 99p.  They could have taken 6 months or several years of work to produce.  What else can you get for £1.95?  Not even a cappuccino.

So what is my time worth?  If no-one pays me, is my time worthless?  If my book is available free, is it worthless? And how much does size really matter?


Related posts:


Wednesday, 19 December 2012

Time to Write

Finding the time to write and how to divide your time between writing and marketing your work is a regular topic for writers, and for good reason.  It can be a constant challenge, and I have tried various strategies but have not yet found a perfect solution.

However, I recently came across two blogs which give great advice.  Both Self-Published Authors and Dean Wesley Smith talk about how to prioritise your time and their take on the 80/20 rule. Check these out:

                                                   

Sunday, 18 November 2012

Time, measures and words: a rant

"It's all about the time we have (left) and how we choose to use it."  

I heard this in a TV drama and it got me thinking.

Time is a currency more precious than money.  Everything is about time.  From the moment we are born we are all on borrowed time.  We are each a ticking time bomb.

I often wonder why time is divided the way it is.  Who decided we measure time by years and that a year is 12 months and a month is 4.5 weeks, and a week 7 days and a day 24 hours.  Why?

And while I'm thinking about numbers and measures, why is a "blockbuster" novel supposed to be at least 100,000 words and a standard novel 60,000 words?  Who decreed this?  Why do competitions state that a short story should be 1000 words, or 2000 or 4000 or 9000?

This obsession we have with numbers and quantification (is there such a word?) is not helpful.  Can't a story or a novel be as long as it needs to be?

Rant over, although it is a topic I will likely return to....

Wednesday, 11 July 2012

Time for Creatabot

I'm really thrilled to be a contributor to the excellent online magazine for creatives and artists called Creatabot, which aims to inspire, inform and promote creative people in the UK.  
To quote editor Natasha Steer,  "Creatabot is a community interest website which means any funds generated are principally reinvested in the website or into the community, rather than being driven by the need to maximise profit for contributors and owners."


My first post is an exploration of our attitudes to time, entitled Tick Tock.  Click on the links below to find out more and read the feature. 

 http://creatabot.co.uk/2012/07/10/tick-tock-by-jane-ayres/

http://creatabot.co.uk/2012/07/10/introducing-a-new-creatabot-contributor-jane-ayres/

http://creatabot.co.uk/about-creatabot/



Friday, 6 July 2012

Time to spare

I just saw a commercial for the Territorial Army on TV, in which viewers are informed they can train to be a soldier in their spare time.  “Spare time.”  It got me thinking about the concept of time, how we use it, segment it and categorise it.  Time that is essential and time that is “spare, extraneous.”  The more you think about it the less sense it makes.  There is an assumption that time should be earmarked and that most of it (and our lives) should be spent on work, doing a paid job.  And then, if any of it is left, we fill it with hobbies. So it is all used up.  Time is a commodity and spare time is a luxury, a privilege. 

When I was a child I railed against clocks.  I always resented having to work to a schedule, to obey the tyranny of the clock.  Maybe that’s why, try as I might, I have always had a problem with timekeeping.  Perhaps there’s a deeply ingrained part of me that just resents it.  I used to ask, “who invented the clock, who dictated that we divide our day into 24 hours, into 7 days.  Who decided that office hours are 9-5, so the roads are jammed with traffic during the man-made concept of rush hour.  Why?”

It’s a question I still ask myself. 

Related post: http://janeayres.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/writing-routines-and-running.html

Sunday, 5 February 2012

Time to write


When I was a child, writing and reading was a form of escapism for me.  I was quite shy and insular and lacked confidence in social situations.  I enjoyed making up stories and writing them down.  Aside from school work, I also wrote poems and prose for my own pleasure, entered a few competitions and won a few prizes.  So I decided from an early age I wanted to be a writer - probably a journalist.  In my teens, I sent stories to magazines and got published .  I expanded stories into serials and attempted to write a short novel, which I never finished.  I discovered that I could earn bit of extra money from my stories, which, when I left home, was needed to pay bills.  In parallel with this, I have always worked for an employer.  From the age of 13, I had a variety of part time jobs and as life went on, and relationships and mortgages followed, I continued to work full time and my dreams of being a full time writer remained dreams.

When I reached my twenties, I got an agent and produced 2 pony novels a year whilst continuing in salaried employment. To meet the publishers deadlines, weekends and holidays were spent writing.  I worked very hard for very many years and was probably more productive than at any time since.  I continued to envy those who could afford to write full time, who maybe had the luxury of a partner who supported them to pursue their ambitions.


As I reached my thirties and forties I found ways to reorganise my working hours to build in more time to write.  This involved some very early mornings, and, for a year, I managed to persuade one employer that I could squeeze my 37 hours a week into 4 longer days and do the job just as well.  Eventually, I came to a point some years ago when I juggled several part time jobs to create more time to write but even then it was a struggle.  The self discipline that had been a major part of my twenties was now lacking, and writing seemed to come harder to me. I moaned and whinged to anyone who would listen that there simply weren’t enough hours in the day.

When, for a brief period of time, I did actually have some free time, how ironic that I was unable to motivate myself to produce anything worthwhile.

Next month I will be fifty and over the years I have realised that I no longer want to be a full time writer.  The dream that sustained me throughout years of commuting and jobs that I usually got bored with, had gradually faded.  I need to interact with people, to learn new things and share experiences.  All of this feeds my writing and makes life richer.  What works best for me is to have some flexibility, some control, even if this is only 1 or 2 days a week, to organise how I use that time.  I write in blocks, intense bursts of activity that can take me weeks or longer to gear up to.  I really admire writers who have the discipline to write something every day.  I remember once reading about a successful author who still retained her 9-5 office job, writing in the evenings and weekends.  I felt resentful when I had to do this for years, but she actively chooses to structure her life in this way.  That’s the key element in all this - choice.  If you feel trapped and constrained, you end up being frustrated and constantly telling yourself, “If only I had more time to write I could achieve X, Y and Z.”    “If” can be a very damaging word.

I have learned that on the rare occasions I have an unexpected expanse of “free” time I am very good at wasting it.  (Although John Lennon apparently said, “Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted.”  I like this.)

What I enjoy most about writing is playing with ideas.  Writing is about ideas and language.  Whether you are chained to a desk in a boring office job or stuck on a packed commuter train, your mind is still free to play and explore and for me that is the real fun.  The physical act of translating those ideas onto a computer screen or notebook - that’s the graft.  That’s the hardest bit.